Criminal Justice at the cross road

A quick fix in dealing with problems of law and order is likely to be counter productive, yet every time there is a public outcry about a particular case and sentencing, senior politicians respond with tough talk about longer sentencing. The result is the justice system is suffering overload with prisons continuing to be near to their record numbers. A great number of those in prison have been shown to be mentally ill while, suicide, self harm etc. rocket out of control.

In some U.S. states like California the bowing to public pressure led to the introduction of the highly controversial "three strikes and out" legislation which meant a mandatory sentence. This has evidently led to some bizarre sentencing such as 25 years for petty theft. Yet the Prime Minister continues to call for similar measures in the U.K. This has led a former chief inspector of prisons to ask why he doesn't "shut up" for the sake of stability in the prison service.

Blair clearly intends to stay and have his way with some very right wing legislation in education and health as well as criminal justice. While the underlying need for reform was clearly there in our institutions the ideological belief in privatisation to provide public services, for example, has led to unwelcome outcomes, not least the expense. Many firms, such as Capita, have done extremely well from New Labour, and we now know that some of these have either given or lent substantial sums to the Party. As many have commented Blair and New Labour have trodden ground that even the Thatcher Government would not dare set foot. Ideas put forward then which met with strong revulsion are now part and parcel of our institutions. That Blair has held such views from the beginning is also evident, but the following of so many New Labour M.P.s is less easily explained.

As for Capita, it now has its fingers in so many pies - as a quick search on the web shows - but it appears it cannot lose in any cicrumstance. Capita administered a student loan scheme which was considered a failure, yet the firm still earned £66 million from it. £100 million of public money went into the echeme.

Posted by John Tyrrell at June 16, 2006 8:14 AM

Comments

Post a comment

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


Remember me?